We at Flickchart have been wanting to do t-shirts and posters for some time, but we also wanted to have something creative, special, and unique. To achieve this, we put our feelers out to some of our favorite artists to find someone who could come up with their own visual spin on what Flickchart’s all about. Our search led us to designer, illustrator, and artist – Brandon Schaefer.
You may have seen some of Brandon’s work elsewhere on the web, and even associated with many of the movies on Flickchart. Here’s a taste of some of the other great work Brandon has done:
Brandon took the essence of Flickchart and devised this new work – “Heroes vs. Villains” – which pits some of cinema’s most iconic good guys against evil in a fight to the finish. Ray Stantz vs. Chucky. Robocop vs. Hannibal Lecter. Batman vs. Jason. Marty McFly vs. The Terminator. Who will win?
This design is available as both an affordable museum-quality poster print and a custom t-shirt – both in a variety of shapes and sizes. If you have some extra cash from the holidays burning a hole in your pocket, now’s your chance to show your support and grab one of these. Have a happy new year and let us know what you think!
Just wanted to let everyone know that we’ve found one of the biggest culprits in our speed issues. We found that there are 207 damaged sectors on one of the hard drives used on our servers, but we’re still awaiting replacement from our hosting services (unfortunately the weekend is not the quickest time to get a speedy response). While this is not the only issue slowing things down, it’s likely a huge portion of it.
The site’s back up now, but it will still have some sluggishness and slowness until we can get the drive swapped. We really appreciate your patience as we work through these issues and get Flickchart running at tip-top shape for you.
Until then, our apologies for any lag, time outs, or slowness you may experience. We’ll let you know more as it happens. Thanks, everyone.
UPDATE: At 2:21 pm Eastern, we pulled the site back down into maintenance mode so we can get a replacement drive in place on our server. Hang tight.
UPDATE: At 10 pm Eastern, we’re back up. Speeds should hopefully be better now. We still have some more bugs to fix, but things should be relatively smoother now in terms of performance.

When Jeremy and I came up with the concept for Flickchart, one of the biggest catalysts was that we felt like ratings were never quite good enough to truly describe how much we liked a film using some sort of numerical value. With only 4 or 5 stars, there just wasn’t enough nuance to differentiate from movie to movie. But what about 1-100 scales? Or 10 stars? It was just too arbitrary to pick a value in the middle somewhere, and say concretely that we liked a film exactly 7.7 out of 10, or 64 out of 100. What could we actually point to within ourselves to say that one movie was a 65 out of 100 instead of a 64 out of 100. It just seems too hard to quantify when judging a single movie’s merits on their own, and coming up with a value that represents one’s honest opinion. The rest, as they say, is history…
That being said, we know there are a lot of people that are justifiably more used to the idea of rating movies instead of ranking them. It’s no wonder, as we’ve been doing it reportedly since July 31, 1928 when New York Daily News critic, Irene Thirer (PDF link) , awarded “The Port of Missing Girls” one star. (Read more about the origins of star ratings at The Critical Numbers and Let’s Rate the Ranking Systems of Film Reviews – both from Carl Bialik, aka “The Numbers Guy”, of The Wall Street Journal.)
So if you’ve come from a long lineage of rating movies with stars (and let’s face it – we all have), here’s a little exercise to explain how you might reorient your Flickchart rankings and extrapolate them back to just simple ratings – using a few films from my list as examples.